Skip to main content

Bonding over Bonds: My take on why Daniel Craig is the ultimate Bond.




 

Whether it be the classic dialogues, dry humour, the vodka martinis or the tantalizing womanizer, every cinephile has had their rendezvous with the ravishing British spy created by Ian Fleming, and brought to life by numerous terrific actors over the years. From the dashing Timothy Dalton, to a ravishing Roger Moore, all the way to the classically handsome Pierce Brosnan, each of the actors has played the character brilliantly and brought to life the intelligent and seductive British spy. We’ve seen Bond jump roofs, romance the most beautiful of women and live the life every young boy dreams of.

In contrast to these dashing heroes, we see the selection of Daniel Craig, who does not strike people as obviously handsome or as suave or even as athletic. But I feel the selection of Daniel Craig as Bond shows a growing maturity in the industry. The ancient mainstream action movie cliché was shrugged off with the introduction of a protagonist who isn’t as macho or as stereotypically male as his predecessors. Daniel Craig as Bond shows genuine progress in the industry, from blatant punching, bloodshed and womanizing to a character who empathizes, suffers loss, and becomes wholly human.

This is what I feel makes Craig the best Bond – his ability to make the character believable, to make him human. I remember sitting in the dark on my springy couch, peering into the screen as I saw Bond struggle to free his lover. In Casino Royale, Vesper (played by Eva Green) is seen drowning, and Bond is tugging at immovable bars to free his love. The pain on his face was palpable, and I saw a previously god-like character become human. I saw him transform into a man before my very eyes, shedding his golden shell. I saw Bond fall in love, lose his love and mourn his love. No matter who we are, loss comes to us all; and in this scene, Craig created a mortal man from the pseudo-mythical character.

I was part of the generation that grew up watching Pierce Brosnan as Bond, with woman ogling at him left and right. He seemed never to stumble, never fall, and always get the girl. He was the ultimate spy. But this perfection was what made him so apparently fictional!

When Craig was cast, all such aspersions were shoved aside. Both in Skyfall (2012) and Spectre (2015), we are allowed a peek in the psyche of Bond, of what makes him tick. He still maintains his stiff upper lip and his suave manner, but in solo scenes, we are exposed to a Bond who has seen and felt unimaginable pain. He has failed and fallen, lost his love, been tortured and has seen his closest confidants bleed out before him. The trauma of a survivor is portrayed beautifully, and a holistic and believable picture of Bond is sculpted. There is one scene in particular that has burned itself into the corners of my mind. Bond is seen shooting targets. He begins with one hand and an easy posture. He misses. He proceeds to improve his grip and posture, but misses again. Furious with his failure, he rushes forward towards the target while firing multiple shots, finally achieving his desired shot. This scene may seem rather plain, but to me, it portrays the fall of a giant. We notice that the once impeccable shot is now unable to attain perfection. It is almost like a fall from grace, a leap from perfection. He is not the honed killer he once was. We see his hand shaking, the panic and fear evident on his face. That is what made Craig stand apart. He was hurt. He has failed.

To me, any character is easier to adore if he/she is similar to ourselves. Previously, Bond was a character to simply be marvelled at, to be beheld from a distance. Craig was the first to convey to the audience that “Look, I am just as human as you are. I bleed like you. I feel pain like you. I am not extraordinary. I am one of you.” In Skyfall, we see his immeasurable loss in the form of his old house, the decaying memories of deceased parents and lost adventures. The dying of M and the destruction of the house are symbolic; that part of his life has been burnt out of existence. Spectre follows his recovery, and Daniel Craig’s impressive portrayal of a man trying to stitch himself together leaves me thinking about one of John Mayer’s immortal tracks where he sings,

 “I’m in repair, I’m not together but I’m getting there”.

 

-       Surjo Siddhanta Ray

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Here Again.

        I stood there, the angry red and fading green leaves shielding my eyes from the merciless sun. There was a welcome chill in the air, the harbinger of the coming winter, bidding goodbye to vivid autumn. The concrete path through the woods seemed out of place, almost as if it were placed there just for me. I walked on, deeper into the woods while the tall trees stood by like disciplined guards. The dying leaves crunched under my heavy brown boots. I knew why I was there, and it would surprise many to hear that my stroll into the woods wasn’t for a relaxing day, but to attend my rendezvous with Thanatos. Yes, you heard me right. The very angel of death had called on me. I knew I was to die in exactly 25 hours and 38 minutes. That was the deal I had made with him. A deal I do not regret, not for a second. But as the breeze ushered the voices of the forgotten past into my ear, I wondered what Thanatos desired of me now. I reached the end of the paved path; beyond ...

Is love political? An understanding through Bhakti poems.

The definition of "political" seems to be rather elusive. The idea of being political in today’s tense climate projects a difficult position, as the varying opinions and their sensitivity, are increasingly creating a dangerous atmosphere. But if we think objectively, almost all acts, positions and thoughts are inherently political. There is an unspoken, yet vibrant, power play in every situation in life. I use the word vibrant deliberately, as powerplay tends to be often misconstrued in a negative fashion, whereas it is one of the most interesting and palpably exciting features of everyday life. For example, in a class of 10, if one student decides to sit on the table instead of the chair, he is making a very political move, wherein the power structure is inherently disturbed. There is visible tension. The student is consciously choosing to break the balance of power which has been previously established. Therefore, when something that trivial can be political, an emotion...